Animals should not be used for research

Should animals be used for scientific research essay millions of animals experience painful, suffering and death due to results of scientific research as the effects of drugs, medical procedures, food additives, cosmetics and other chemical products. Alternative methods of research do not simulate humans and whole body systems in the same way and are not as reliable no many animals are used for experiments and then killed it is expensive to use model organisms as the animals must be purchased and then fed, housed and cared for some people will consider using animals in the lab to be immoral.

animals should not be used for research Animal testing is bad science: point/counterpoint  a wealth of cutting-edge non-animal research methodologies promises a brighter future for both animal and human health  because the awa specifically excludes rats, mice, birds, and cold-blooded animals, more than 95 percent of the animals used in laboratories are not even covered by the.

Should the use of animals in research be a mandatory part of modern progressive science yes currently animal testing is a compulsory, legal part of drug testing animal studies are always used alongside other types of research such as cell cultures, computer modelling and human clinical trials. Animal testing is not always ideal, but it remains necessary for research while it is important to consider the well-being of animals when conducting such research, it must also be recognized the potential knowledge, developments, and discoveries that can be gained.

Animals should not be used in drug development medical research because like humans they also have feelings just like humans animals are gods creatureswe should not hurt them in any way in my opinion hurting animals is a crime. The only us law that governs the use of animals in laboratories, the animal welfare act (awa), allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. Therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of products first, animals' rights are violated when they are used in research tom regan, a philosophy professor at north carolina state university, states: animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment . Although humans often benefit from successful animal research, the pain, the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of products first, animals' rights are violated when they are used in research.

95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal animal welfare act (awa), which excludes birds, rats and mice bred for research, and cold-blooded animals such as reptiles and most fish 89% of scientists surveyed by the pew research center were in favor of animal testing for scientific research. Animal testing is a hot button issue with a multitude of opinions on each side it’s an industry where there are entire companies dedicated to the breeding of animals used for experimental purposes.

Animals should not be used for research

Animals should not be hurt without any meaning or purpose, but comparing to scientific research, we are compelled to hurt them, because animals are necessary of use in product development plus currently this is the only way to test products and will continue to be used to ensure our safety. Science, medicine, and animals, institute for laboratory animal research, published by the national research council of the national academies 2004 page 2 the royal society 2004, the use of non-human animals in research: a guide for scientists, page 1 walgate, r 1981, armadillos fight leprosy nature 291 (5816): 527. Universities, corporations, and companies are all playing a part in perpetuating the use of animals as research subjects in reality, it does not need to be this way 5 reasons testing on.

  • In the absence of research with rodents (95% of all animal research subjects) and other animal models in which new medications and treatments can be developed and evaluated, new treatments will either not be used or will necessarily involve risky experimentation on humans.

Although animal testing is wrong, it is a good way to make sure the product research is safe before retailing it and letting people use it animal testing should not be used because animals have no way of saying no and it is wrong is every way animal testing is wrong because animals can’t say no. Although animal testing is wrong, it is a good way to make sure the product research is safe before retailing it and letting people use it animal testing should not be used because animals have no way of saying no and it is wrong is every way.

animals should not be used for research Animal testing is bad science: point/counterpoint  a wealth of cutting-edge non-animal research methodologies promises a brighter future for both animal and human health  because the awa specifically excludes rats, mice, birds, and cold-blooded animals, more than 95 percent of the animals used in laboratories are not even covered by the. animals should not be used for research Animal testing is bad science: point/counterpoint  a wealth of cutting-edge non-animal research methodologies promises a brighter future for both animal and human health  because the awa specifically excludes rats, mice, birds, and cold-blooded animals, more than 95 percent of the animals used in laboratories are not even covered by the.
Animals should not be used for research
Rated 5/5 based on 35 review
Download

2018.